Do a raw black and white scan with silverfast 6.6

#Do a raw black and white scan with silverfast 6.6 how to
#Do a raw black and white scan with silverfast 6.6 upgrade
#Do a raw black and white scan with silverfast 6.6 full
#Do a raw black and white scan with silverfast 6.6 pro
#Do a raw black and white scan with silverfast 6.6 software

There are two basic types of photo scanners, flatbed and dedicated. Today letвЂ™s take a brief journey into the world of scanning, with the goal of making the best possible scan for manipulation in Lightroom.ДЇirst, letвЂ™s consider a scanner.

#Do a raw black and white scan with silverfast 6.6 software

You should, however, take a look at what software you plan to edit these images in, and scan in your images with that in mind. Most peopleвЂ™s arguments for their method have merit, often erring on the side of disk space. There is a great deal of debate on proper scanner settings, scan resolutions, bit-depth and so forth. Scanning, in fact, is an art but it is only arcane if you let it be. Scanning images from prints, negatives and slides has taken on the air of an arcane art. Today letвЂ™s take a brief journey into the world of scanning, with the goal of making the best possible scan for manipulation in Lightroom. Whether your source material is a print, slide or a negative, you only have one option to make it a digital file, scanning.

#Do a raw black and white scan with silverfast 6.6 full

I don't like being sucked into a future of expensive upgrades if I just go with the flow/SF.If youвЂ™re like me, you probably have a few shoe boxes full of old negatives from the days before digital. So if I get the Vuescan process down pat, I'm good to go forward without the high cost of upgrading SF.

#Do a raw black and white scan with silverfast 6.6 pro

Vuescan upgrades cost nothing (with Pro version).

#Do a raw black and white scan with silverfast 6.6 upgrade

If I were to upgrade to SF8, it would cost me about $450 in upgrade charges, plus whatever they will want for the HDR program, which I'd gotten at a very good price with special deal. I kept the 6.6 OS on an external drive, so I can reboot into the older OS and use SF 6.6 if I need to go that route (but somewhat of a PITA). My only problem with SF is that I would need to upgrade to SF8 to use it with the new Mac OS- SF 6.6 won't work with the new Mac OS. If Vuescan can do the job (and it does for others), I think that will be the way to go. It will take some work, but I now have the Vuescan Bible, which I find helpful. I had Vuescan before SF, and am probably switching back to Vuescan.

#Do a raw black and white scan with silverfast 6.6 how to

I've been pretty happy with it, once I figured out how to set it up. I have Silverfast AI for my Nikon 9000 and Epson 4990. I then use VueScan to obtain raw scans, and that works very well. I bought Wolf Faust targets, and use them to calibrate the scanner with VueScan. On the other hand, Silverfast English documentation is so awful that I discarded Silverfast immediately after reading it some years ago (maybe it is better now). VueScan documentation is not well written, to put it mildly, but in the long run I managed to grasp most of its behaviour, through many experiments and tests. That said, some people argue that an elaborated scanner profile is not necessarily better than a simple one, and they may easily be right. I am left with the Profiling procedure which is embedded into VueScan, which makes a 'simplified' kind of profiling. The only possible grievance I might have with VueScan is that I did not manage to have it work with more elaborated scanner profiles such as those created by SIPC. For that I don't think that Silverfast would be superior to VueScan. Unless you want to make fast scans of many pictures (such as for internet use after a party or a holiday) the way to go, IMO, is to always make a raw scan. A 'raw' scan lets you scan only once and postpone all decisions to a later phase. I don't do any kind of adjusting (levels, contast, colour) in the scanning phase.

All the rest of the work is in Lightroom and Photoshop. Vuescan is relatively inexpensive, and can be used with scanners of different make and model. My advice! Get them both, and have fun with your scanning. The Vuescan Professional version probably supports a major percentage of every scanner out there, and is updated quite frequently by Paul Hamrick, the gentleman who created it, and runs the site. Silverfast has just released 'Silverfast 8' which we are waiting for more information on. In fact I have just purchased 'The Vuescan Bible' Sascha Steinhoff, to see if I can improve my general Vuescan skill level.ДЄ couple more points in passing that you might also want to consider.

I have always managed to pull out a scan - but never feel that I have mastered the package. Vuescan IMO will also yield very decent scans, but: I have always found it to be a bit more difficult to work with - primarily in the basic adjustments for black and white points, and the slider controls used for Curves. I have always found the Silverfast package that I use: Silverfast SE Super, very nice to use, and able to yield quality results.

Have run both packages on the Minolta and they both work very well, and yield good results.